Hugo Grenier vs Li Tu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Grenier and Tu have demonstrated commendable performances in recent months, especially in terms of second serve execution. Grenier has secured 47.4% of points on their second serve, slightly edging past Tu, who has achieved a 44.44% success rate. This statistic is crucial as it bears a strong correlation with match outcome predictions.

Analyzing return game performance, Grenier has outperformed Tu in recent form by winning 46.47% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Tu's 45.89%. Furthermore, in first serve returns, Grenier holds an advantage with 23.85% over Tu's 21.98%. Such figures are significant indicating which player might have an upper hand in a head-to-head encounter.

In terms of pressure situations, Tu has shown slight superiority in saving breakpoints, with a success rate of 54.08%, surpassing Grenier's 53.16%. This metric serves as an insightful tool for in-game betting predictions. Performance over the last year reveals that Tu holds a marginally better match-winning proportion of 55.71% (W/L 39/31) compared to Grenier's 54.29% (W/L 38/32), thereby contributing to overall head-to-head prediction analysis.

Examining surface preferences, both players exhibit their most successful career win percentages on hard surfaces, with Grenier at 65% (W/L 232/123) and Tu equaling this figure at 65% (W/L 141/77). Conversely, Grenier's weaker performances appear on clay with a 42% win rate (W/L 54/74), while Tu's is on grass with a 54% win rate (W/L 14/12).

Regarding player level, both Grenier and Tu have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K in the past year. Grenier has won 52% (W/L 26/24) over these contests, whereas Tu boasts a slightly better performance at 54.35% (W/L 25/21). It’s essential to consider the players' performance relative to the event level they participate in.

In assessing opponent quality over the past 12 months, Tu has faced opponents with a higher average rank of 208.11, in comparison to Grenier's average opponent rank of 305.46. If the upcoming match heads into a deciding set, Grenier displays better form, winning 56% of deciding sets compared to Tu’s 48%.

Analyzing breakpoint opportunities, Tu appears more efficient, converting 31.29% of such chances, surpassing Grenier who converts 28.47%. This aspect is crucial for live betting scenarios when players encounter breakpoint opportunities.

Based on these comprehensive statistics, Tu holds a slight edge over Grenier, primarily due to their stronger performance in broader match contexts and under pressure situations. This positions Tu as the more likely winner in the upcoming match.